There is
one name that does not come as a household name like Henry Ford, but this one
man had quite a great influence on the world today. Without this man, the use
of tempered glass in the modern era would not be the same. For my writing
class, I went and analyzed how people wrote about Harold McMaster (his
biographies). From what the University of Toledo and the Ohio State University
has to write about him, it seems very positive. OSU even gave him an honorary
doctorate years back for his work. I notice that between these biographies,
they both follow a logical order. They report his life chronologically and use
dates and numbers to display his timeline. Both of the biographies I read
contained no images, but pathos was still conveyed in the wording of the
biographies. As the writers go from start to finish, they take the reader on an
emotional journey. They make you feel his failures and successes by making you
feel bad about the failures and making you happy for the successes. The writers
both focus more on the successes over the failures and gives the reader a sense
of accomplishment even though the biography is not even about them. The
credibility (ethos) is also accomplished in this article by the use of primary
sourcing. They give dates, explain logically what happened, and gain trust from
the reader. I think both of these biographies done well by keeping a logical
order, accuracy to their information, and giving the reader a sense of being
proud of other people. They give an equal balance to logos, ethos, and pathos
which gives the touch to a biography about a person that well deserves it. I
want to add that the reason I chose to write about Harold McMasters is that he
was a close partner and friend to Norman Nitschke, my grandpa up until his
death a few years ago. Glasstech, an incorporation that still exists today, was
created through the extraordinary partnership of McMaster and my grandpa.
McMaster is well accomplished with over 100 patents in both the glass
tempering field as well as in combustion engines. He has a truly brilliant
mind.
Very nice rhetorical analysis. Great!
ReplyDelete